Stay knowledgeable with free updates
The International Energy Agency chief has criticised Europe for falling behind China and the US after making “two historic monumental mistakes” in energy coverage, by counting on Russian gas and turning away from nuclear energy.
Fatih Birol, the company’s government director, instructed the Financial Times that European business was now paying the worth for these errors and that the bloc would want “a new industrial master plan” with a purpose to recuperate.
The Paris-based Birol’s intervention comes because the EU leaders put together to debate the bloc’s financial competitiveness this week.
It trails China and the US in areas resembling manufacturing of fresh applied sciences because of a mixture of burdensome rules and greater energy costs. Electricity costs within the EU are sometimes twice to a few occasions greater than within the US.
“The existing industries, especially the heavy industries, are experiencing, and going to experience, a significant cost disadvantage compared to other major economies such as China and the United States,” Birol mentioned.
Data from the energy watchdog exhibits the EU has made a profitable shift away from Russian gas following the invasion of Ukraine. In 2023, the EU produced extra electrical energy from wind energy than gas for the primary time.
Gas from Russia beforehand accounted for greater than 40 per cent of the bloc’s provides, however dropped to fifteen per cent in 2023 regardless of an uptick in imports of liquefied pure gas imported from Russia by ship.
Supplies from Norway and the US have been instrumental in permitting the EU to keep away from blackouts — accounting for 30 per cent and 19 per cent of complete imports respectively — however the fast rollout of renewable energy has additionally helped.
The debate over nuclear energy has been extra polarising, nevertheless.
Countries resembling France, Hungary and Czech Republic are pro-nuclear however different EU member states resembling Germany, Austria and Luxembourg are strongly opposed, arguing that nuclear initiatives are sometimes topic to delays and price blowouts, and will drain cash higher spent on renewable energy.
Amund Vik, former Norwegian state secretary for energy and a senior adviser on the consultancy Eurasia Group, mentioned it was “more difficult to do the energy transition without nuclear” as a constant baseload of energy was wanted to underpin inconsistent wind and solar energy technology.
“Some of the nuclear discussion is really healthy and some countries need nuclear,” mentioned Vik. “But some of the discussion where it’s like ‘we shouldn’t invest in wind turbines we should invest new nuclear’ isn’t helping anyone.”
In 2019, the EU set out among the many most bold local weather targets on the earth with a dedication to chop emissions by 55 per cent in contrast with 1990 ranges by 2030 and attain web zero by 2050.
It has since adopted the vast majority of laws to remodel its economic system to fulfill that purpose however politicians worry a backlash when legal guidelines resembling a ban on new inside combustion engines or extra stringent energy effectivity guidelines begin to have an effect on voters forward of upcoming EU-wide elections.
Green insurance policies are additionally falling down the checklist of presidency priorities as safety fears associated to migration and the struggle in Ukraine preoccupy leaders.
Dan Jørgensen, the Danish local weather and growth minister, mentioned that to take care of residents’ assist for the Green Deal, the EU wanted to “do our homework” and be sure that local weather coverage was built-in.
This needed to be finished in a means that “does not hurt our competitiveness, does not hurt our employment, does not lead to more inequality but actually does the opposite . . . it’s extremely timely that we have a discussion about what this looks like.”